Create better lessons quicker
Create Activity
Log In
Sign Up
English
Home
Features
Price Plans
Community
Home
Features
Community
Contact
Price Plans
Help Center
Log In
Sign Up
Language
My school
My Profile Page
Edit personal details
Language and Location
Log Out
Català
Cebuano
Čeština
Dansk
Deutsch
Eesti keel
English
Español
Français
Hrvatski
Indonesia
Italiano
Latvian
Lietuvių
Magyar
Melayu
Nederlands
Norsk
Polski
Português
Română
Slovenčina
Slovenščina
Srpski
Suomi
Svenska
Tagalog
Türkçe
Vietnamese
ελληνικά
български
Русский
Српски
Українська
עִברִית
عربى
हिंदी
ગુજરાતી
ภาษาไทย
한국어
日本語
简体字
繁體字
McCulloch v. Maryland - The federal government can establish national banks due to the necessary and proper clause (stated in article 1, section 8 of the Constitution) and holds authority over the state law due to the supremacy clause (article 6), U.S. v. Lopez - Congress can't make whatever laws it wanted by using the commerce clause (in 1st Amendment) as justification, and in doing so, it exceeds it's constitutional authority;, Engel v. Vitale - Public school sponsorship of religious activities violate the establishment clause of the 1st Amendment, due to public schools being counted as an extension of the government (where sponsored religious activities would be considered unconstitutional), Wisconsin v. Yoder - Forcing Amish children to stay in school past 8th grade violates the free exercise clause in the 1st Amendment, Tinker v. Des Moines - Students don't lose their 1st Amendment right to peacefully protest when they enter schools; in this case, wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War, New York Times v. United States - Freedom of press applies to things the federal government wants to cover up under the 1st Amendment if it doesn't violate prior restraint, Schenck v. United States - Determined that free speech does not apply when creating a "clear and present danger" due to prior restraint, Gideon v. Wainwright - Determined the 6th Amendment right to a attorney applies to the states through the 14th Amendment, and not providing an attorney would be a violation of rights, McDonald v. Chicago - About a law that had been previously determined in a different state to be a "fundemental liberty." Concerns 2nd Amendment and the 14th Amendment with how the Bill of Rights applies to the states, Brown v. Board of Education - Determined separate is not equal, and that argument was a violation of the 14th Amendment, and henceforth desegregated schools, Citizens United v. FEC - Corporations count as people in the respect of political views and donations, and henceforth are protected under the 1st Amendment, Baker v. Carr - Concering rural vs. urban districting, this case created the 'one person one vote' doctrine; placing unequal power between voting citizens due to district population (even when districts are the same size) violates the 14th Amendment Equal Protections Clause, Shaw v. Reno - Racial gerrymandering isn't constitutional due to the 14th Amendment, Marbury v. Madison - Established judical review (power of judical branch to shoot down unconstitutional acts from the legislative and executive branches), which is stated in Article 3, Section 2 of the Constitution ,
14%
AP Gov Required SCOTUS Cases 2023
Share
by
129021
10th Grade
11th Grade
12th Grade
History
Social studies
More
Edit Content
Print
Embed
Assignments
Leaderboard
Show more
Show less
This leaderboard is currently private. Click
Share
to make it public.
This leaderboard has been disabled by the resource owner.
This leaderboard is disabled as your options are different to the resource owner.
Revert Options
Match up
is an open-ended template. It does not generate scores for a leaderboard.
Log in required
Visual style
Fonts
Subscription required
Options
Switch template
Show all
More formats will appear as you play the activity.
Open results
Copy link
QR code
Delete
Continue editing:
?