Topicality: Def: aff must stay within wording of resolution, Significance of Harm: Def: aff must prove status quo causes issues, Inherency : Def: aff must prove current system can't/won't solve issues, Structural: current system can't fix harms b/c of defects in laws, Attitudinal: current system can't fix harms b/c lawmakers don't want to, Solvency : Def: aff must prove plan can fix current issue(s), Desirability : Def: aff must prove plan's advantages outweigh disadvantages, Types of Harm (subtopic of Significance of Harm): Scope: great number of people affected by harms, Magnitude: harms affect ppl. to great degree, Social significance: harms affect particular group of ppl., Traditional significance: harms go against traditional beliefs, Moral imperative: harms are ethically wrong,
0%
Stock Issues
共享
由
Kaseyderuiter
10th Grade
11th Grade
12th Grade
Higher Education
Debate
ELA
编辑内容
嵌入
更多
排行榜
显示更多
显示更少
此排行榜当前是私人享有。单击
,共享
使其公开。
资源所有者已禁用此排行榜。
此排行榜被禁用,因为您的选择与资源所有者不同。
还原选项
按组分配
是一个开放式模板。它不会为排行榜生成分数。
需要登录
视觉风格
字体
需要订阅
选项
切换模板
显示所有
播放活动时将显示更多格式。
打开成绩
复制链接
QR 代码
删除
恢复自动保存:
?