Topicality: Def: aff must stay within wording of resolution, Significance of Harm: Def: aff must prove status quo causes issues, Inherency : Def: aff must prove current system can't/won't solve issues, Structural: current system can't fix harms b/c of defects in laws, Attitudinal: current system can't fix harms b/c lawmakers don't want to, Solvency : Def: aff must prove plan can fix current issue(s), Desirability : Def: aff must prove plan's advantages outweigh disadvantages, Types of Harm (subtopic of Significance of Harm): Scope: great number of people affected by harms, Magnitude: harms affect ppl. to great degree, Social significance: harms affect particular group of ppl., Traditional significance: harms go against traditional beliefs, Moral imperative: harms are ethically wrong,
0%
Stock Issues
共用
由
Kaseyderuiter
10th Grade
11th Grade
12th Grade
Higher Education
Debate
ELA
編輯內容
嵌入
更多
排行榜
顯示更多
顯示更少
此排行榜當前是私有的。單擊
共用
使其公開。
資源擁有者已禁用此排行榜。
此排行榜被禁用,因為您的選項與資源擁有者不同。
還原選項
按組排序
是一個開放式範本。它不會為排行榜生成分數。
需要登錄
視覺風格
字體
需要訂閱
選項
切換範本
顯示所有
播放活動時將顯示更多格式。
打開結果
複製連結
QR 代碼
刪除
恢復自動保存:
?