McCulloch v. Maryland - The federal government can establish national banks due to the necessary and proper clause (stated in article 1, section 8 of the Constitution) and holds authority over the state law due to the supremacy clause (article 6), U.S. v. Lopez - Congress can't make whatever laws it wanted by using the commerce clause (in 1st Amendment) as justification, and in doing so, it exceeds it's constitutional authority;, Engel v. Vitale - Public school sponsorship of religious activities violate the establishment clause of the 1st Amendment, due to public schools being counted as an extension of the government (where sponsored religious activities would be considered unconstitutional), Wisconsin v. Yoder - Forcing Amish children to stay in school past 8th grade violates the free exercise clause in the 1st Amendment, Tinker v. Des Moines - Students don't lose their 1st Amendment right to peacefully protest when they enter schools; in this case, wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War, New York Times v. United States - Freedom of press applies to things the federal government wants to cover up under the 1st Amendment if it doesn't violate prior restraint, Schenck v. United States - Determined that free speech does not apply when creating a "clear and present danger" due to prior restraint, Gideon v. Wainwright - Determined the 6th Amendment right to a attorney applies to the states through the 14th Amendment, and not providing an attorney would be a violation of rights, McDonald v. Chicago - About a law that had been previously determined in a different state to be a "fundemental liberty." Concerns 2nd Amendment and the 14th Amendment with how the Bill of Rights applies to the states, Brown v. Board of Education - Determined separate is not equal, and that argument was a violation of the 14th Amendment, and henceforth desegregated schools, Citizens United v. FEC - Corporations count as people in the respect of political views and donations, and henceforth are protected under the 1st Amendment, Baker v. Carr - Concering rural vs. urban districting, this case created the 'one person one vote' doctrine; placing unequal power between voting citizens due to district population (even when districts are the same size) violates the 14th Amendment Equal Protections Clause, Shaw v. Reno - Racial gerrymandering isn't constitutional due to the 14th Amendment, Marbury v. Madison - Established judical review (power of judical branch to shoot down unconstitutional acts from the legislative and executive branches), which is stated in Article 3, Section 2 of the Constitution ,
0%
AP Gov Required SCOTUS Cases 2023
Ibahagi
ni
129021
10th Grade
11th Grade
12th Grade
History
Social studies
I-edit ang Nilalaman
Naka-embed
Higit pa
Leaderboard
Magpakita pa
Huwag gaanong magpakita
Ang leaderboard na ito ay kasalukuyang pribado. I-click ang
ibahagi
upang gawin itong pampubliko.
Ang leaderboard na ito ay hindi pinagana ng may-ari ng aktibidad.
Hindi pinagana ang leaderboard na ito dahil ang iyong mga pagpipilian ay naiiba sa may-ari ng aktibidad..
Ibalik ang Opsyon
Pagtutugma
ay isang bukas na template. Hindi ito bumubuo ng mga marka para sa isang leaderboard.
Kailangan maglog-in
Estilo ng visual
Mga Font
Kailangan ang subscription
Mga pagpipilian
Magpalit ng template
Ipakita lahat
Mas marami pang format ang lilitaw habang nilalaro ang aktibidad.
Buksan ang mga resulta
Kopyahin ang link
QR code
Tanggalin
Ibalik ng awtomatikong pag-save:
?